In a dramatic legal reversal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has reinstated tariffs from the Trump administration, overturning a lower court ruling that had declared them unconstitutional. The decision revives a core pillar of the former administration’s trade policy and reignites uncertainty for distributors who had begun recalibrating their operations.
The tariffs—originally enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)—had previously been struck down by the U.S. Court of International Trade, which ruled that the executive branch had overstepped its authority. But the appellate court disagreed, stating that the president holds broad discretionary powers in matters of foreign trade and national interest, including the imposition of tariffs.
For U.S. distributors, this about-face is more than a legal technicality—it’s a major disruption to strategic plans that were already in motion.
Many distributors had hoped to pass cost savings down the supply chain following the initial ruling. Now, they must reassess pricing models under the continued burden of tariffs. Inventory purchased with lower duty expectations may underperform against margin forecasts. Long-term sourcing strategies, some of which have already been revised once, may need to be redrawn again.
“It’s a setback, especially for distributors that moved quickly after the first ruling,” said Prashant Newnaha, senior Asia-Pacific Rates Strategist at TD Securities. “This kind of legal reversal injects significant uncertainty into trade strategy. The lesson? Flexibility is essential.”
The court’s decision not only sustains the tariffs—it highlights how vulnerable distribution businesses remain to shifting political and legal winds.
“This is no longer just about cost—it’s about resilience,” said Sarah Chiles, trade policy advisor at HamiltonBridge Partners. “Companies need to bake tariff scenarios into their long-term planning. Those who treated the prior ruling as final may now find themselves overexposed.”
The ruling comes at a sensitive economic moment. With Q1 2025 GDP down 0.2%in part due to pre-ruling inventory stockpiles, the ripple effects of this policy reversal could stretch into the second half of the year. Distributors holding large volumes of goods intended for a lower-tariff environment may need to act fast to protect margins or reprice to stay competitive.
Markets, which had rallied on the earlier court decision, gave back some gains following the appellate reversal. Import-heavy sectors—particularly consumer goods and industrial components—led the retreat as investor sentiment turned cautious.
“Don’t assume this is the final word,” Chiles added. “There could still be a Supreme Court appeal or new executive actions, depending on election outcomes. But for now, the tariffs are back—and so is the pressure.”
For now, distributors must pause and reassess. Pricing strategies, supplier contracts, and inventory forecasts demand urgent attention. And with the court affirming broad presidential authority over trade, regulatory unpredictability may become the new normal.
“This ruling reinforces one reality: Trade is a moving target,” said Newnaha. “The distributors that succeed in this climate won’t be the most efficient—they’ll be the most adaptable.”
Don’t miss any content from Distribution Strategy Group. Join our list.
